FOI requests show new levels of council spending to oppose Heathrow’s new runway
London boroughs and Transport for London have spent nearly £1m of taxpayers’ money challenging Heathrow’s expansion in the last 18 months alone.
In the period September 2018 to March 2020 the London Boroughs of Hillingdon, Windsor and Maidenhead, Hammersmith and Fulham and Transport for London spent £944,603 on legal fees, publicity and the direct funding of anti-expansion campaign groups.
Boris Johnson’s home borough of Hillingdon spent £159,626.50 on legal fees, £528.65 on publicity and funded anti-expansion campaign groups such as Stop Heathrow Expansion and the No 3rd Runway group to the tune of £52,000 and £134,696.50 respectively.
Elsewhere, Transport for London spent £452,336 on legal fees; the Royal Boroughs of Windsor and Maidenhead spent £110,417.71 on legal fees; and Hammersmith and Fulham spent £35,000 on legal fees. The London boroughs of Richmond and Wandsworth have not provided information to the FOI request.
In total, from previous FOI requests, these local boroughs have spent a combined sum of nearly £3m of tax-payers money opposing Heathrow’s new runway over the past decade.
Parmjit Dhanda, executive director of Back Heathrow said:
“These FOI requests give us all a sobering reminder that whilst some politicians are talking up a ‘build, build, build’ agenda, the reality on the ground is different. Lawyers have gotten rich taking up councils’ ‘block, block, block’ agenda. It would be sensible if they engaged constructively with the project to ensure we build the cleanest and greenest runway in the world.”
Warren Kenny, GMB London Regional Secretary said:
“The issue of developing more capacity at Heathrow has been round the block of enquires, reports and votes in Parliament for so long that no one can remember all the stages in this exhaustive process to give the go-ahead to this necessary development.
“After Parliament finally gave the green light it is extremely disappointing to discover the extent to which local councillors gave the go-ahead to spend shed loads of taxpayers’ money to further extend and prolong the process. This is a serious waste of public money on what to the public is time-wasting infighting between different parts of the public sector. The public take a very dim view of this activity.”
A local resident from Hayes said:
“Spending this amount of taxpayers’ money on opposing Heathrow expansion seems daft when councils could be focusing their efforts on supporting local public services.” (Photo of Angela Nelson-Iye is attached).
Sally Smith, Chief Operating Officer of Hounslow Chamber of Commerce said:
“If the UK is to mount a fightback from this economic crisis, the government and London councils should make Heathrow and a new runway the centrepiece for our economic recovery. Expensive legal challenges will jeopardise 180,000 new jobs and 10,000 apprenticeships – just at the time when they are needed most.”
In February, the Appeal Court ruled that Heathrow expansion had met the required standards on air quality and noise, but more worked needed to be done to show how the Paris Agreement on carbon reduction targets would be met. The Supreme Court will give further consideration to Heathrow’s expansion in the Autumn.
Borough and TfL spending September 2018 – March 2020:
Hillingdon — £159,626.50 on legal fees and£528.65 on publicity.
Stop Heathrow Expansion – £52,000.
No 3rd Runway group – £134,696.50.
Transport for London — £452,336 spent on legal fees.
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead — £110,417.71 on legal fees.
Hammersmith and Fulham — £35,000 on legal fees.
Richmond and Wandsworth cannot complete the request.
Back Heathrow is a community group with over 100,000 supporters, including businesses, employees, unions, and residents. Over 50% of Back Heathrow’s supporters live within 5 miles of the airport.
Back Heathrow campaign contact:
Graham Stewart, Head of Communications 020 3071 0048 / 07932403431 email@example.com